|
AustraliaFreePress.org
|
| Berlin,
Germany -- [Bill: Lengthy auf Deutsch. I've translated it into English
as best as I can. This is a really radical denunciation of the Holocaust
lie by Horst Mahler -- I expect he'll get a good five to ten in prison
for writing it:]
13 Meadowbush Road Kleinmachnow, e-mail hm@horst-mahler.de Kleinmachnow, on 1/29/06
Mr Dehne c/o City of Kleinmachnow Bureau of Internal Security Reference number: 30.010/06
To the honourable Mr Dehne: The order the Jews have given you is heavy with errors. They did not consider it necessary to grant a legal hearing on this matter. The factual basis you inferred in your order is garnered completely from their accounts in the press. Thus they have invented the facts out of whole cloth, and called them substantial. Their letter to you states, "Given the responsibility of Germany, particularly the history of Germany in relation to the [Zionist Entity], if you make statements denying the Holocaust while abroad, that is still a criminal offense against you as a German citizen, and you will be convicted again and placed in prison." The Jews do not seem to realize that denying the Holocaust is not a crime in Iran. The criminal law of Germany only applies to acts which are committed in Germany (§ 3 StGB). Additionally, I have never been convicted of denying the Holocaust. I discussed the question in court, during the proceedings brought by the Federal Republic against the National Democratic Party, of why the Jews are still hated as a people and why they will continue to be hated. So the 22nd Circuit Court for the region of Berlin convicted me of "incitement of the masses" and sentenced me to nine months in prison. I have appealed that judgment and the Supreme Court has not ruled yet. By leaking your statement of January 26 to the press, your judgment in the case should be invalidated, if for no other reason, then for slanderous and malicious intent. But that argument is secondary. With the "passport limiting measure" you propose, you oppose answering the question of whether the "Holocaust" occurred at all, as the Jews maintain. Perhaps you do not understand that the leaders of International Jewry -- Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson, "the king of the Diaspora Jew" Nahum Goldmann, "Emperor of America" Felix Frankfurt, Rabbi Wise and "The Right Hand of President Roosevelt" Sam Rosenman -- concocted and arranged the historical lies presented at the "international military tribunal" at Nuremberg in order to discredit those who had created the German Reich. The Holocaust laws of the Federal Republic of Germany represents the judicial imposition of fantasy, and derive their authority from the international forces which subjected the German Reich after the international tribunal of Nuremberg. Reality and justice do not guide these laws; rather they are a "continuation of the war efforts of the allied nations" (US Chief Prosecutor Jackson[1]), and the courts which impose them are masks for the tyrannical and despotic government of the enemies of the German Reich. The winners of the Second World War, when Germany had been completely ground into the soil, manipulated history to label the Germans as "criminal" and establish their post-War order -- i.e., the world domination of Mammon based upon a foundation of historical lies. It is impossible that our enemies could have bent history to their will at any time other than of the destruction of the German Reich. They always have and still care for nothing but the maintenance of their power and the protection of their ill-gotten gains. Those who have built on lies, fear nothing but that the truth may bring their world to collapse. Therefore the courts of Germany, in the area of history -- and public consciousness -- have no purpose except to further the interests of the victorious powers, i.e., binding our nation to historical lies, and continuing to fix the Nuremberg judgments against the leaders of the German Reich. With the intent of deceiving the German people about the weakness of the position of the government of Germany, the following scheme was set in place: In the unification treaty, which was signed September 12, 1990, the supremacy of German law was announced as follows: ARTICLE 7 (1) the French republic, the union of the socialist Soviet republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America terminate hereby their rights and responsibilities regarding Berlin and Germany as a whole. As result the appropriate, quadripartite agreements, resolutions and practices coherent with it are terminated and all appropriate mechanisms of four powers are dissolved. (2) United Germany has accordingly full sovereignty over its internal and outside affairs. Fifteen days later, the sovereignity clause in the agreement was nullified from the 27/28th of September forward. This agreement states: "Agreement of 27./28. 9. 1990" 1. (Suspension. Germany contract as a
whole) Article 7 paragraph 1 of the "Treaty for the Prohibition of War and Maitnenance of Court Judgments of May 26, 1952" the so-called "Transition Agreement" reads as follows: (1) All judgements and decisions in
criminal actions, which proceeds from a court or a judicial authority of
the three powers [France, Britain, America] or their delegates in
Germany now or at a later (!!) time, remain valid and legally effective
in each regard in precedence over German rights and are by the German
courts (!!) and authorities to be treated accordingly. The historian, German Federal Armed Forces General A.D. Gerd Schultze Rhonhof, describes this regulation as follows [2]: The judgements of the INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL of the victorious powers at Nuremberg attach. Nuremberg processes are judgements and decisions in the sense of the O.A. article 7 (1). The German Ministries for Education and Culture and subordinate agencies are authorities in the sense of the O.A. article 7 (1). They issue the framework guidelines for the coursework at the universities and schools and permit books and teaching materials to be used in instruction, including among them the school history books. The INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL in Nuremberg was not required on August 8, 1945 according to the Article 19 of its statute, to have rules of evidence. According to the Article 20 of the same statute the Court of Justice could permit or reject evidence. Thus evidence the defense could have used to rebut prosecution argumetns at the Court of Justice was often not considered. The judgments of the Nuremberg Court contained recitals of facts relating to the causes of the Second World War and to the actions of German armed forces in the Second World War. These recitals of the facts are part of the judgements. They may not be doubted by German courts and authorities, even in the light of new historical material or evidence, according to article 7 (1). To those judgments the Ministries for Education and Culture are also bound regarding school book contents. That, Mr. Dehne, you should know, is what you enforce. By trying to protect the lie of the Holocaust against historical truth you are directly implementing the destructive will of our enemies. The "application" of the "laws" of the Federal Republic of Germany never impairs the interests of the Jews. When it comes to the implementation of Holocaust law, that becomes clearer the more openly one speaks. [3] Thus it becomes necessary here, short of referring to the Nuremberg process, for this shameful mark of civilization to be revealed: The invention of the Holocaust can be attributed to Litaui(?) Jews -- to the brothers Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson. The implmentation of this lie caused the Jewish World Congress' President Nahum Goldmann, the "King of the Diaspora Jews", to celebrate this lie as "one of the greatst acts in the history of the international justice and morals."[4 ] Nahum Goldmann gives an idea of how Jewish circles were employed to penetrate this idea into the government. It [the Jew] writes: "The Jewish World Congress under the leadership of the two brothers Robinson turned large energies on the mental and moral preparation of these processes, and it is because of them that the famous acts of the Roosevelt administration in accepting the principles of Nuremberg occurred, over the objections of the Allies and particularly of England." [5] One can imagine how this report of Nahum Goldmann goes over [6]. "It was in the war years, 1941/42, when we received from Geneva information on the destruction of the Jews in the Nazi camps, making Wise decide that we would have to see the president, in order to impress on him the fact that the Allies must warn the Germans beforehand of the punishment they would receive after the war and the consequences of their brutal policy. We had a weekend meeting with Rosenman [7] in the mansion, which it [the Jew] inhabited in the summer near the Roosevelts' "Hode Park" home, in order to discuss what it should suggest on Monday in Washington to the president. It was a hot morning, and we sat on the veranda in the mansion of Rosenman, without jac?ket and tie, when we suddenly heard the president's car, and noticed that Roosevelt was on his way to see Roseman. We wanted to slip fast into our skirts (?), but Rosenman said, this was not necessary, since the president does not attach importance to formalities. Immediately thereafter the car of the president appeared before the veranda, and before we could say something to greet him, Roosevelt remarked: " It is interes?sant that Sam Rosenman, Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldmann sit and contemplate what orders they are to give to the President of the United States. What the Nazis would say if they could get a photo of this scene." We began too say that we were discussing an urgent message from Europe, which we would have Roseman submit to the President on Monday. Roosevelt agreed to it: "That's fine. Have Sam Roseman come to me Monday and tell me what I have to do," and then drove on." And in other places the Jew expresses his
joy over his exercise of power more "Nearly all presidents, during the time in which I lived America - Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon - had their "yard Jews", rich semi-humans, who helped to finance the presidential campaign, and who became politically influential Jewish leaders... " [9] An outstanding Jew of this kind, was one Felix Frankfurt, that "Roosevelt... always stood personally close to". That Jew was "for many years one of the most influential personalities in Washington". He was thus given the name "Emperor" by much of America. "Many of the Jew's students had been given, at its recommendation, important positions in the Roosevelt administration." "Frankfurt was one who did not attach importance to acting on the front stage, but preferred to be behind the window blinds pulling on the wires of power" [Bill: A terrible mixed metaphor there] [10] While the British government had pleaded that the most important members of the German leadership should be executed without further trial -- at least 50,000 Germans overall -- Stalin's will was that formal legal proceedings should be introduced, and the USA became interested. Robert Houghwout Jackson (1892-1954), a close trusted friend of the President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, had served under presidential authority from 1936 to 1939 as Deputy Secretary of Justice and in 1940/41 as Secretary of Justice. He held the opinion that the Nuremberg Tri?bunal was "a continuation of the war efforts of the allied Na?tions". [11] Jackson was sent to Europe with the order to hold Germany firmly in debt from its defeat in the Second World War. In that order Roosevelt instructed Judge Samuel Rosenman at the beginning of of April 1945 to London to devise a common prosecure for the trial of "war crimes". On 5 April 1945 the British Lord Chancellor Sir John Simon, head of the British juridical system pleaded, for a summary execution of Hitler and his consorts without any kind of trial. Also the British prosecutor general Sir David Maxwell Fyfe explained to Rosenman, that he was "personally for the method of the summari?schen execution".[12 ] One day later communicated Simon nevertheless stated that that Washington "demanded legal proceedings before execution"[13] ... [Bill: Translation to continue later ...]
|